Home
Wikimization
Contact Us
Accumulator error feedback
CVX Download
Calculus of Inequalities
Rick Chartrand
Chromosome Structure EDM
Complementarity problem
Compressive Sampling
Compressed Sensing
Conic Independence
Convex Cones
Convex Functions
Convex Geometry
Convex, Affine, Conic: Hulls
Convex Iteration
Convex Optimization
Convex Optimization Group
Dattorro PC Optimization
Dattorro Supercomputer
Distance Geometry
Distance Matrix Cone
Dual Cones
Duality Gap
Eigenvalues/Eigenvectors
Elliptope and Fantope
Euclidean Distance Matrices
EDM cone faces
Extreme Directions
Face Recognition
Farkas Lemma
Fermat point
Fifth Metric Property
Jensen's Inequality
Jobs in Optimization
Kissing Number
Harold W. Kuhn
Linear Algebra
Linear Matrix Inequality
Manifold Learning
MATLAB for Optimization
Matrix Calculus
Molecular Conformation
Moreau's theorem
Isaac Newton
Angelia Nedic
Open Problems
Positive Matrix Factorization
Positive Semidefinite Cone
Projection
Projection on Cone
Proximity Problems
PY4SCIENCE
Quasiconvex Functions
Rank Constraint
Rockafellar
Justin Romberg
Michael Saunders
Schoenberg Criterion
Semidefinite Programming
Sensor Network Localization
Smallest Simplex
Systems Optimization Lab
Stanford SOL
Talks on Optimization
Joshua Trzasko
Video
Wikimization     Meboo     SOL      Video     CVX     Contact     
Felice crystal
Home arrow Kissing Number
Kissing Number

Two nonoverlapping Euclidean balls are said to kiss if they touch.  An elementary geometrical problem can be posed: Given hyperspheres, each having the same diameter 1, how many hyperspheres can simultaneously kiss one central hypersphere?  The noncentral hyperspheres are allowed, but not required, to kiss (a.k.a, ball packing problem).

                         kissing number of sphere packing

As posed, the problem seeks the maximal number of spheres K kissing a central sphere in a particular dimension.  The total number of spheres is N=K+1.  In one dimension the answer to this kissing problem is 2.  In two dimensions, 6.

The question was presented in three dimensions to Isaac Newton in the context of celestial mechanics, and became controversy with David Gregory on the campus of Cambridge University in 1694.  Newton correctly identified the kissing number as 12 while Gregory argued for 13.  Their dispute was finally resolved in 1953 by Schutte & van der Waerden.  In 2003, Oleg Musin tightened the upper bound on kissing number K in four dimensions from 25 to K=24 by refining a method by Philippe Delsarte from 1973 based on linear programming.

There are no proofs known for kissing number in higher dimension excepting dimensions eight and twenty four.

Translating this problem to an EDM graph realization is suggested by Pfender & Ziegler.  Imagine the centers of each sphere are connected by line segments.  Then the distance between centers must obey simple criteria:  Each sphere touching the central sphere has a line segment of length exactly 1 joining its center to the central sphere's center.  All spheres, excepting the central sphere, must have centers separated by a distance of at least 1.

From this perspective, the kissing problem can be posed as a semidefinite program.

Read more...

 
Course,   Video
Convex Optimization
     convex optimization
Stephen Boyd 
L. Vandenberghe 


Dattorro      convex optimization Euclidean distance geometry 2ε
Dattorro


Course
Bertsekas
     books by Bertsekas
Dimitri Bertsekas 


See Inside Hiriart-Urruty & Lemaréchal
Hiriart-Urruty
& Lemaréchal


See Inside
Rockafellar Rockafellar