Moreau's decomposition theorem
From Wikimization
(Difference between revisions)
(→Proof) |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
and thus <math>y=P_{\mathcal K^\circ}z</math>.</li> | and thus <math>y=P_{\mathcal K^\circ}z</math>.</li> | ||
| - | <li>2<math>\Rightarrow</math>1: Let <math>x=P_{\mathcal K}z</math>. By the characterization of the projection we have <math>\langle z-x,p-x\rangle\leq0,</math> for all <math>p\in\mathcal K</math>. In particular, if <math>p=0</math>, then <math>\langle z-x,x\rangle\geq0</math> and if <math>p=2x</math>, then <math>\langle z-x,x\rangle\leq0</math>. Thus, <math>\langle z-x,x\rangle=0</math>. Denote <math>y=z-x</math>. Then, <math>\langle x,y\rangle=0</math> | + | <li>2<math>\Rightarrow</math>1: Let <math>x=P_{\mathcal K}z</math>. By the characterization of the projection we have <math>\langle z-x,p-x\rangle\leq0,</math> for all <math>p\in\mathcal K</math>. In particular, if <math>p=0</math>, then <math>\langle z-x,x\rangle\geq0</math> and if <math>p=2x</math>, then <math>\langle z-x,x\rangle\leq0</math>. Thus, <math>\langle z-x,x\rangle=0</math>. Denote <math>y=z-x</math>. Then, <math>\langle x,y\rangle=0</math>. It remained to show that <math>y=P_{\mathcal K^\circ}z</math>. |
| + | |||
| - | We will show that <math>z-P_{\mathcal K}z=P_{\mathcal K^\circ}z</math>.</li> Indeed, let <math>q\in K^\circ</math> be arbitrary. Then, | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
Revision as of 16:10, 10 July 2009
Moreau's theorem is a fundamental result characterizing projections onto closed convex cones in Hilbert spaces.
Let be a closed convex cone in the Hilbert space
and
its polar. For an arbitrary closed convex set
in
, denote by
the projection onto
. For
the following two statements are equivalent:
,
and
and
Proof
Let be an arbitrary closed convex set in
,
and
. Then, it is well known that
if and only if
for all
. We will call this result the characterization of the projection.
- 1
2: For all
we have
.
Then, by the characterization of the projection, it follows that
. Similarly, for all
we have
and thus.
- 2
1: Let
. By the characterization of the projection we have
for all
. In particular, if
, then
and if
, then
. Thus,
. Denote
. Then,
. It remained to show that
.